
British A.N Wilson, author of the 1990 atheistic book called, “Jesus: A Life“, which denied the divinity of Jesus and the miraculous aspects of his birth, life and death, has now recanted his previous views as an atheist and got back to the fold.
Raised a Christian by his parents, A.N. Wilson was a former atheist who was a member for many years of the company of smug mockers of religion that dominates Britain’s chattering classes. Wilson’s faith weakened as he matured and collapsed completely by the time he was in his 30s.
But in the following years as an atheist, A.N. Wilson found himself drawn back to the faith of his childhood, driven both by the personal experience and sightings of daily Christian values in his everyday life and by the grand awakening that religious believers, not atheists, are the ones who have reason on their side.
Here is the very moving testimony of A.N. Wilson which he wrote in his article in the Daily Mail:
Religion of hatred: Why we should no longer be cowed by the chattering classes ruling Britain who sneer at Christianity
By A N Wilson
Last updated at 1:22 AM on 11th April 2009
A week ago, there were Palm Sunday processions all over the world. Near my house in North London is a parish with two churches. About 70 or 80 of us gathered at one of these buildings to collect our palms.
We were told by the priest: ‘Where we are standing in Kentish Town does not look much like a Judaean hillside, and the other church to which we are walking does not look much like Jerusalem. But as we go, holding our palms, let us try to imagine the first Palm Sunday.’
And so we set off, singing All Glory, Laud And Honour! and holding up our palm crosses, to the faint bemusement of passersby, who looked out of their windows at us, tooted their horns as we blocked the traffic or smiled from sunny pavements.
We were walking, as it were, in the footsteps of Jesus as he entered Jerusalem on a donkey while crowds threw palms before him. Except our journey was along the pavements strewn with the usual North London discarded syringes, chewing gum and Kentucky Fried Chicken boxes.
When we had reached our destination, a small choir and two priests sang the whole of St Mark’s account of the last week of Jesus’s life – that part of the Gospel that is called The Passion.
It is said the chant used for this recitation dates back to the music used in the Jewish Temple in Jesus’s day.
We heard of his triumphal, palm-strewn procession into Jerusalem, his clash with the Temple authorities, his agonised prayer in the garden of Gethsemane, his arrest by the Roman guards, his torture, his trial before Pontius Pilate, his Crucifixion and his death.
So there we were, all believers, and a disparate group of people, of various ages, races and classes, re-enacting once more this extraordinary story.
A story of a Jewish prophet falling foul of the authorities in an eastern province of the Roman Empire, and being punished, as were thousands of Jews during the governorship of Pontius Pilate, by the gruesome torture of crucifixion.
This Easter weekend we revisit the extraordinary ending of that story – the discovery by some women friends of Jesus that his tomb was empty. And we read of the reactions of the disciples – fearful, incredulous, but eventually believing that, as millions of Christians will proclaim tomorrow morning: ‘The Lord is risen indeed!’
But how many in Britain today actually believe the story? Most recent polls have shown that considerably less than half of us do – yet that won’t, of course, stop us tucking into Easter eggs (symbolising new life) and simnel cake (decorated with 11 marzipan balls representing the 11 true disciples, with Judas missing).
For much of my life, I, too, have been one of those who did not believe. It was in my young manhood that I began to wonder how much of the Easter story I accepted, and in my 30s I lost any religious belief whatsoever.
Like many people who lost faith, I felt anger with myself for having been ‘conned’ by such a story. I began to rail against Christianity, and wrote a book, entitled Jesus, which endeavoured to establish that he had been no more than a messianic prophet who had well and truly failed, and died.
Why did I, along with so many others, become so dismissive of Christianity?
Like most educated people in Britain and Northern Europe (I was born in 1950), I have grown up in a culture that is overwhelmingly secular and anti-religious. The universities, broadcasters and media generally are not merely non-religious, they are positively anti.
To my shame, I believe it was this that made me lose faith and heart in my youth. It felt so uncool to be religious. With the mentality of a child in the playground, I felt at some visceral level that being religious was unsexy, like having spots or wearing specs.
This playground attitude accounts for much of the attitude towards Christianity that you pick up, say, from the alternative comedians, and the casual light blasphemy of jokes on TV or radio.
It also lends weight to the fervour of the anti-God fanatics, such as the writer Christopher Hitchens and the geneticist Richard Dawkins, who think all the evil in the world is actually caused by religion.
The vast majority of media pundits and intelligentsia in Britain are unbelievers, many of them quite fervent in their hatred of religion itself.
The Guardian’s fanatical feminist-in-chief, Polly Toynbee, is one of the most dismissive of religion and Christianity in particular. She is president of the British Humanist Association, an associate of the National Secular Society and openly scornful of the millions of Britons who will quietly proclaim their faith in Church tomorrow.
‘Of all the elements of Christianity, the most repugnant is the notion of the Christ who took our sins upon himself and sacrificed his body in agony to save our souls. Did we ask him to?’ she asked in a puerile article decrying the wickedness of C.S. Lewis’s Narnia stories, which have bewitched children for more than 50 years. Or, to take another of her utterances: ‘When absolute God-given righteousness beckons, blood flows and women are in chains.’
The sneering Ms Toynbee, like Richard Dawkins, believes in rational explanations for our existence and behaviour. She is deeply committed to the Rationalist Association, but her approach to religion is too fanatical to be described as rational.
Perhaps it goes back to her relationship with her nice old dad, Philip Toynbee, a Thirties public school Marxist who, before he died, made the hesitant journey from unbelief to a questing Christianity.
The Polly Toynbees of this world ignore all the benign aspects of religion and see it purely as a sinister agent of control, especially over women.
One suspects this is how it is viewed in most liberal circles, in university common rooms, at the BBC and, perhaps above all, sadly, by the bishops of the Church of England, who despite their episcopal regalia, nourish few discernible beliefs that could be distinguished from the liberalism of the age.
For ten or 15 of my middle years, I, too, was one of the mockers. But, as time passed, I found myself going back to church, although at first only as a fellow traveller with the believers, not as one who shared the faith that Jesus had truly risen from the grave. Some time over the past five or six years – I could not tell you exactly when – I found that I had changed.
When I took part in the procession last Sunday and heard the Gospel being chanted, I assented to it with complete simplicity.
My own return to faith has surprised no one more than myself. Why did I return to it? Partially, perhaps it is no more than the confidence I have gained with age.
Rather than being cowed by them, I relish the notion that, by asserting a belief in the risen Christ, I am defying all the liberal clever-clogs on the block: cutting-edge novelists such as Martin Amis; foul-mouthed, self-satisfied TV presenters such as Jonathan Ross and Jo Brand; and the smug, tieless architects of so much television output.
But there is more to it than that. My belief has come about in large measure because of the lives and examples of people I have known – not the famous, not saints, but friends and relations who have lived, and faced death, in the light of the Resurrection story, or in the quiet acceptance that they have a future after they die.
nice….
But there is more to it than that. My belief has come about in large measure because of the lives and examples of people I have known – not the famous, not saints, but friends and relations who have lived, and faced death, in the light of the Resurrection story, or in the quiet acceptance that they have a future after they die.
Reply
Although Mr. Wilson’s return to faith is laudable, his reasons for returning to faith are as inadequate as his reasons for leaving in the first place. In the Broadway play, “The Man of La Mancha,” Don Quixote wisely advises us to beware of a fanatical pursuit of happiness, lest, unhappily, we should overtake it. In his own quest for faith, Mr. Wilson is in danger of overtaking it.
You see, we who believe in Jesus the Messiah possess a palpable person, not a hypothesized faith. Therefore any actual return to the Faith will require a conversion to the set of all the facts that Christianity asserts. Without realizing that Christianity is factually true, faith in the Christian story is worthless.
Mr. Wilson will need to face and study the historical events of the factual Christian Faith and convert to the following certainties:
the apodictic fact that God became a real human being,
the apodictic fact that Jesus was God in human flesh,
the apodictic fact that all men and women are, from the moment of conception, evil sinners condemned to a real and endless punishment in hell,
the apodictic fact that Jesus was in His own body the Propitiation for humans’ sins so that no one will be in hell who chooses not to be in hell,
the apodictic fact that Jesus was crucified and died under Pontius Pilate,
the apodictic fact that Jesus died and was buried for three days,
the apodictic fact that on the third day Jesus rose physically and literally from the grave,
the apodictic fact that there is one, and only one, True God, one, and only one, true Gospel that leads to salvation, one, and only one, true intercessor between God and man and one, and only one, True Faith.
When Mr. Wilson does this, then he will actually realize the meaning of the Scripture which says, “And this is the Victory that has overcome the World: the Faith which we possess.”
By this, we do not mean that we overcome Mr. Wilson’s list of skeptics by means of a confident moral certitude (nor by a sixties-style defiant skepticism of skepticism itself), but rather, we mean that Christians can face the full fury of the World that “kills the dreams we dream,” as sung by Susan Boyle, because Jesus has removed the enmity in us that kindled God’s fury against us by removing all of our sins by His propitiatory, vicarious death.
May we all pray that Mr. Wilson, Great Britain, and the Whole World may find this kind of saving faith: obedience to the facts that Christianity asserts.
Reply
Sa britain daw ay maraming anti-religion sa intelligentsia. Dito sa Piilipinas. Marami ring ganyan. Tingnana na lang natin yung maraming blogs ng Filipino Bloggers na laging tinitira ang Simbahan at pinagtatawanan tayong mga nananalig sa Kanya.
They do not understand. They do not want to open up their minds.
Ishmaels latest blog entry..San Jose, Occidental Mindoro
Reply
At last kapatid na Bluep, nakabisita na rin ako sa iyong newly renovated house… Partly, I have to agree with Bro Mauricio about AN Wilson’s return to faith… BUT I believe no matter how inadequate his reasons may be, one can never come to God unless he is not called. His response to the call of conversion may not be adequate to our own reasons, but who are we to judge?
I am still happy that there were Christians surrounding AN Wilson whose noble lives became a potent call and message to his return.
coolwaterworkss latest blog entry..Featured in PBSP Annual Report
Reply
Mauricio Escobedo Reply:
December 5th, 2009 at 2:32 am
Mr. Cool; respectfully, I ask you to consider that the reasons for one’s conversion do matter. A lot. God Himself has certain requirements of people who say that they believe. Remember that Jesus said that on the Day of Judgement, some will say, “Lord, did we not cast out demons in your Name?” In that day, the Master will say, “Depart from Me, I never knew you.” Mr. Cool, do you see? We are to judge ourselves, rather than to wait until He Judges us; for if we are true men and women, then there will be a place for us in the Kingdom of Heaven. So what does God require? The Scriptures say, “Whoever comes to God must believe that He is…” You see, we must be CONVINCED by reasonable and rational consideration of the evidence that there is good and sufficient reason for us to believe that God exists. Saying that we have warm feelings toward God or an intuitive, subjective, certitude are insufficient. Jesus rebuked St. Thomas for NOT believing the EYEWITNESS EVIDENCE of people whose credibility he knew! And then Jesus blessed those of us who would be convinced by the preponderance of the evidence, rather than by being eyewitnesses ourselves like the Apostles (who wrote: What we have seen and heard we proclaim to you…). Those who enter God’s peace must, then, believe in One God, the Creator of heaven and Earth…we must believe in the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit (one God), we must believe that Jesus suffered and died, under Pontious Pilate, a Propitiatory, Vicarious death, we must believe that Jesus died, was buried and physically resurrected from the Dead on the third day, according to the Scriptures… . Does this sound familiar? We say this every Sunday. So then, there is a set of beliefs that ALL CHristians MUST believe, or they are christians that the Lord Himself will repudiate on the Last Day (even though they address Him as, “Lord.” We are indeed glad for believers around Mr. Wilson, but let us be sure that they are true men, women and children who communicate the True Facts of the Faith that was delivered to the Church once and for all.
I was about to exit your homepage when i found this article, i could not miss it… its inspiring that the Christians around him became his inspirations too in going back to his faith. The most effective way of preaching is to live the faith we profess and sharing Christ to our brothers and sisters in deeds.
honeys latest blog entry..Backside Smoother!
Reply
Mauricio Escobedo Reply:
December 5th, 2009 at 2:50 am
Dear Honey, I just finished telling Mr. Cool that the facts of the Gospel are crucially important in order to have a true conversion to the faith. But you have touched on reverse side of the same coin (as James wrote in his Epistle); and without the whole coin (both sides), no one will see God. If we say that we love God, we must also keep His commandments (or we are liars and we do not know God at all). What commandments are we to keep? That we love God truly, and that we love one another, just as He loved us. Without these two realities (love of God and love of our neighbors) no one can say that he is converted to Jesus. And our love cannot be like the world’s love which is full of ego, greed and deception. Nor is our love to be only for those who are attractive, who please us or who stand to repay us: our love is to be for the poorest of the poor; for widows, orphans and those who are marginalized. Then, we will truly become His witnesses (as He said) before a watching world that will want what we have: a Savior who gives Eternal Life and Hope. Honey, may God bless you to walk in the Light, AND IN THE CERTAIN KNOWLEDGE OF GOD (GIVEN ALL THE PROOF), until the dawning of the Day that will see Jesus return in Power and Great Glory.